The Rational masculine – precautionary Medicine (2015) analyzes male and also female sexual industry value and the gamings women play come manipulate men and maximize your dating and also sexual returns.

You are watching: The rational male - preventive medicine


About The Author: Rollo Tomassi is among the most well-known figures of the manosphere.He is the author of one of the most popular red pill books called, similar to his blog, “The rational Male“. Tomassi defines himself in “Preventive medication Volume 2” as “a student of life just as much as you are” and, that adds, “as such, I recognize the value of knowing that I know nothing”.

#1. This Is Hypergamy In A Nutshell

Hypergamy is probably the most central concept in Rollo Tomassi philosophy. And we can summarize it as follows:

Hypergamy is the female drive to certain the finest genes she can and, ideally but not necessarily from the same man, attract the many resources she can.

Rollo Tomassi states that ideally, she will acquire both good genes and also abundant sources from the same man.But that’s unlikely… specifically in this days.

My Note: space today’s males really poorer than in the past?This is a recurring design template in the manosphere that today’s men are not as “good” or “mannish” together in the past.And albeit that’s potentially true, I’m far from convinced around it -and over there is no data to earlier that up, as far as I’m aware-.

Also read:

#2. The scientific research of Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks

Rollo Tomassi mentions the Kinsey academy study.

The examine shows exactly how facial choices in women adjust depending on their menstruation period.

And, Rollo says, women want mannish male when they’re ovulating and most likely to be impregnated and prefer more feminine males when they’re the very least like to get pregnant.

Rollo Tomassi claims that’s the basis, and proof that the “alpha fucks beta bucks” theory.

My Note: The research was unclear, actuallyAlbeit what Rollo says provides sense, the research he cites actually disproves his very own theory.This is what the examine says:

However, there to be no significant difference in masculinity preference in between women in the low- and also high-conception probability groups

Read much more in the “criticism” section.

#3. This just how Women Behave depending upon Which phase They’re In

Rollo Tomassi categorizes women -and their date behaviors and also expectations- into various categories depending on which life’s phase they are in:

15 year old: into hot boys with good bodies, face symmetry, best eyes color, and proper haircut. In between 15 and also 25, even a man with a beta perspective can be effective if he has a great physique.Women between 18 and 20 room incapable come commit to anything.The break Phase: late teenager years, moving to college she is lean to finish the relationship and also enjoy her options during her optimal yearsparty year (20-25 YO): enjoy peak SMP and start developing and appreciation for inner alpha qualities. She longs for perfect of alpha male with irreversible provider capabilitiesLate party years: during the last third of party year she start feeling much more pressure because that a long term commitmentEpiphany Phase (28-30 YO): she realizes it’s tough to compete with younger women, she switches from supplies coming to her to feeling like it’s she who requirements to secure a good man.She still hopes she can “convert” the negative alpha boysTransitory phase (29-31 YO): competition stress and anxiety increases, she’s currently getting more interested right into beta providersSecurity phase (31-34 YO): affluence, status and resources end up being the significant attractor for women. It’s more an overwhelming to video game them because they require commitmentDevelopment phase (7-9 year after appointment & children): ~ a few years she has consolidated her place with a provider, a mrs doesn’t need a provider anymore. She SMV decreases if his hold steadier, therefore she tries to become much more dominant to maintain the power balance (my note: I’m not sure this is accurate: females initiate most divorces in long term marriages)

My Note:A lot of an excellent points in this phases.But, as well, part mistakes part generalizations. Ages and mores also readjust a lot depending upon the culture, and also this uses to liberal and libertine societies (ie.: as of today it’s an extremely western-centric).

#4. These space Female Manipulation’s Tools

I really delighted in these pearls of wisdom.

For example:

Men room incapable come commit“: it’s just women who find it tough to uncover a male who say that in an effort to mend their egos“Men require to males up“: 30 YO or larger trying come shame men into gaining serious, yet actually masking she realization that she’s now shedding all her power to lure men

And much more generally:

Men shaming: this is what she does when she can’t discover a man who “forgives her” of her wild past or when he refuses come provide

Also read:

#5. Providers Are Culturally-Manipulated Men

I just partially agree yet I love this part.

Rollo Tomassi claims that the “feminine imperative” (sic) and the cultural expectations for males to provide can end up being straight-jackets because that men.

Rollo proposal you clock this clip native “Breaking Bad” to understand the point:

#6. The an ext Powerful She Is, The more Honest She Is about Hypergamy

This to be a an extremely deep observation.

Rollo Tomassi says that women who can provide for themselves are freer to speak openly around their dual dating strategy (ie.: love the alpha negative boy however pretend you choose the provider that sticks around).

The instance is Sheryl Salzberg, author of Lean-In.

Salzberg open recommends ladies to date approximately the bad boys but to only and also marry work out a guy who wants an equal partnership and “is happy or, also better, desires to execute his fair share that chores in the house”.

LOL, Rollo Tomassi completely nailed that there.

However, women that cannot provide for themselves as lot as Salzberg can, still have to play the game and pretend castle actually choose the “egalitarian man”.

This is since most women need to settle for a tradeoff in between alpha men and also providing men.And as soon as the time comes to settle down, they have to pretend they prefer the providing men.

Preventive medication Quotes

On what females want:

Women want men who other males want to be and also other women want to fuck

On women’s position on a man’s life:

Women must be the complement to a man’s life, not its focus

On women’s manipulation effort to do men right into providers (I paraphrase):

Men need to male up is the fight cry of every single woman older than 30

This is just how Rollo Tomassi defines game:

A collection of behavioral modifications to life skills based on psychological and sociological principles to facilitate intersexual relations in between genders



I thoroughly delighted in “The reasonable Male precautionary Medicine”.

And i agree with lot of the content.

But, very same as for its predecessor “The rational Male“, I likewise found much to object to.

If you’re a red-pill Rollo fan, arm yourself with an open mind before delving in.

Did you?

Great.Then, for review of the red pill, check out this video clip analysis:

OK, then let’s start:

#1. The Data Is Misrepresented (To right The Narrative)

Rollo misquotes research studies to right his narrative.

For example, he quotes The brand-new York article saying:

According to a current study through iVillage,less than halfofwedded women marriedthepersonwho was thebest sexoftheir resides (52 percent say that was one ex)

Rollo titles the thing “nobody marries their best sex ever”, i beg your pardon is clearly a finish mischaracterization since almost fifty percent do.

But, most of all, that misrepresents -or misunderstands- the data come fit his narrative.

In a nutshell, he indicates that the research proves that ladies fuck the alphas as soon as young but marry the betas afterwards when in search of a beta provider.

However, Rollo doesn’t establish the research study proves the opposite of what Rollo Tomassi says.

You only require a modicum the logic and also math to understand it.

If women’s mean sex companion count is 5 partners -just to continue to be on the low finish of the range-, then chances she marries the best sex of her life are just 20%.

Instead, it’s much more than double!

And that fully invalidates Rollo’s theory.

#2. Over there Are number of Unsubstantiated Claims

Says Rollo Tomassi:

The many secure, monogamous attachment ladies make space with guys they awareness to be one to two points over what she perceives to it is in her very own sexual market value.

I actually agree v the gist the the concept.

But… based upon what does he entrust “points”, and on what scale?The famous old PUA “0 come 10 HB scale”?

And climate again:

Arguments around chores and also sex life are most common in couples whereby the woman makes the decisions.Female decision-making standing is an also bigger predictor of relationship dissatisfaction 보다 female breadwinner status.(…)Women despise being the leaders

Based top top what walk he to speak that?Because my personal observations don’t substantiate the at all. Relationships with female management tend come be more stable and last longer.

So ns really would have liked to inspect for resources. Or at least for a deeper evaluation as to the “why that’s the case”.

But nothing… simply Rollo’s own ideas presented together truths.

Overall, the totality “Preventive Medicine” is usually a book built around unsubstantiated claims.

That’s not necessarily wrong.I often repeat the a an excellent observer of social dynamics can be better than a good research, but it’s other to save in mind.

Pop Psychology

It’s funny.

Rollo Tomassi pokes funny at what he refers to as “the popular music psychology of the love languages”.

But love languages room not pop-psychology and several research studies have confirmed their existence. Even psychologists that are an essential of their usefulness check their relevance.

It’s “The rational Male precautionary Medicine” that sounds like pop-psychology at times.

#3. Evolution Psychology Doesn’t add Up

Evolutionary psychology is the best tool to recognize sexual dynamics.

But not as soon as you comprise stories the sound credible yet that have actually no clinical backing.That’s just storytelling.And that’s OK… IF one clearly stated that they are an individual conjectures.

That wasn’t constantly the instance in “Preventive Medicine”.

Sometimes, I uncovered evolutionary psychology come contradict several of Rollo’s theory.For example, the renowned theory that beta males are always left stop the bag for the “alpha fucks men“.But if beta males were repetitively so stupid to carry out and stick roughly older and less productive women -and countless surely are!-, shouldn’t these men have disappeared indigenous the lineage?

Or, in ~ the very least, shouldn’t there be so couple of of them that the “alpha fucks” strategy falls short so well?

That doesn’t it seems to be ~ to be the case.Instead, that seems favor beta men are creating lots of other beta men. So, in the end, it might be more correct to say “alpha fucks more and provides less”, betas fucks a bit less, and also provides more”.

Also read:

#4. Young girl Pair Up v Alphas, Old girl Pair Up v Betas Doesn’t include Up Mathematically

This one also doesn’t include up.

The idea the the “alpha fucks, beta bucks” is the the alphas are sexy and also cool and they only give their dick.And the betas space boring, pedestalize women, act favor their emotional tampons and also support lock financially.

Younger women, says Rollo, desire the alpha.Older women want the betas due to the fact that they rod around.

There is fairly some reality in that and that is the case for part women. However reality is no so black and also white. For all ladies to posesthe alphas together youngsters and also marry betas together oldsters, there should be twice the numbers of men.Obviously, that’s not the case.

That’s becuase fact is more complex and variegated.

Some betas additionally do bang (a bit).And part alphas likewise do gain married and stick roughly (just look in ~ Trump, Berlusconi, and many other tycoons. Even if they had women top top the side, they still gained married).

There are certainly two much more important categories of alphas:

Or watch here:

Or read “lovers VS provers VS friends” for a contempt deeper explanation that sexual industry values.

Alpha Fucks: A tool For Posturing & Ego-Massaging

That mantra is frequently used in the manosphere as a tool for ego massaging.

People who check out alpha fucks think that themselves as alphas.And climate they go around repeating the mantra as an effort to social climb on some imagined (or occasionally real) “blue-pilled betas”.

This is referred to as “alpha male posturing”.And as Rollo said in this very same “Preventive Medicine”: rich civilization don’t must say they’re rich.And alpha men don’t have to say they’re alphas.

#5. The Ovulatory shift Is no The clinical Basis the The “Alpha Fucks Theory” It’s Drummed approximately Be

Tomassi presents the ovulatory transition as if the the corroboration of the “alpha fucks, beta bucks” theory.

Logically, it renders sense.

However, the ovulatory change in human beings is a hypothesis, and the proof backing it stays quite, fine “shifty”.

Albeit that sounds really appealing, the actual results when it concerns humans are not as apparent -or as strong- as Rollo provides it sound.

Meta-analysis reflects both supporting evidence and contrasting evidence.

I quote a an excellent recent study providing a pretty overview:

While some studies that measure up women’s hormones to characterize present fertility report women’s preferences for masculine characters were stronger once conception is more likely47, several recent studies have discovered no change in friend preferences amongst women at the peri-ovulatory phase because that muscularity48,49, face masculinity23,49,50, beards23,51, vocal masculinity52,53and facial symmetry49. Thus, the extent to i m sorry ovulatory cycle move are associated with women’s mate preferences may have actually been overestimated in past research because of imprecise methodologies and small sample sizes54.

Marcinkowska et al., 2019

I personally think the ovulatory shift is probably real.And yet, the ovulatory change not nearly as strong as Rollo Tomassi makes it sound in his “Rational male trilogy”.Personal female choices seem to more powerful than cycles.

Overall, I discover some of the “science” behind Rollo’s theory to be evolutionary psychology conveniently bent come fit the narrative.

#6. The “Feminine Imperative” cultural Inculcation Is (Vastly) Overblown

Rollo Tomassi is nearly as obsessed through this as feminists space with the patriarchy.

He seems to be convinced that there is a feminine propaganda that crooks all men’s natural instincts.

For example:

This is a significant frustration because that beta young men predisposed come effeminate conditioning that convinces lock they will certainly be rewarded for loyalty, support and building partnership equity

“Effeminate” conditioning?

I acquire what Rollo is talk about, however it’s not effeminate conditioning.

Loyalty and support are valid characteristics to be exchanged in the sexual marketplace.Maybe they’re not the people Rollo favors -and neither room they the ones ns favor-, however they’re still precious traits which perform can aid men to uncover mates, under specific circumstances.

At same of genetics, a loyal and supportive guy will most regularly beat an unsupportive and disloyal one for long-term mating.

It provides sense, no?

And I’m also missing what would be Rollo’s alternate here.Disloyalty, selfishness and not structure relationship equity?

It sounds like a good recipe for a an excellent relationship… Not.

#7. The reasonable Male has Sect-Like Undertones

There are facets of sect-dynamics in this philosophy.

The group that need to stick together, the “manipulative enemy” come study and also defend from and other guys to recruit and also turn to the red-pill credo.

Labeling is also component of the game.

Sects make their members feeling “special”.And what’s the easiest means to do it if no denigrating anyone else who doesn’t buy right into the sect?

Enter the terms “beta” because that those that don’t buy into your theories.The “blue-pilled betas” space the idiots and the suckers who get played.

And have fun “us”, the red-pilled people within the sect, we room the cool alphas.

I find that both childish and off-putting.And ns wished an ext for a thought leader.

Also see:

And I recommend you to check out this post so central both to this website, and also to an individual empowerment:

#8. Comprised Conspiracy of “Feminine” Propaganda provided As Straw-Man

Rollo sees society as a big feminine indoctrination.

For example:

The feminine imperative has actually learned to recognize and exploit this organic deference by including as an inevitable component of future men’s beforehand conditioning(…)The feminine command IS the priority.


Again, I in reality agree with the general principle that different interest groups try to manipulate others.But it’s seldom an arranged effort, and also it’s even more rarely an organized effort which manages to overcome all other groups’ interests.

Instead, Rollo Tomassi speaks together if there to be a mystery sect of “master that puppets” women who efficiently manipulate the media and also the society to keep men subjugated.

That is hogwash.

Let me state this clearly:

The idea the there is some kind of mystery propaganda administer by the “feminine imperative” that successfully “effeminizes” men and manipulates guys to serve women is nonsense.

But that’s specifically what reading Tomassi feeling like.

It’s all about “feminine imperative”, “conditioning”, “feminine influence pervading men” etc. Etc.

The keyword in mine sentence is “effectively”.Because sure women tend to take on and talk up values that advantage men.

But so perform men.

The truth is that culture is much too complicated and far too fragmentized to yield so passively to any kind of indoctrination or propaganda indigenous a population’s minority.

Sure, everyone will certainly be make the efforts to pitch what ideal suits your interest, however rarely any type of voice can be so strong as to drown the end all various other groups’ understanding (with the only exception maybe being the conservative propaganda, but even over there we’re not talking around indoctrination).

Furthermore, Rollo then keeps making use of this made-up conspiracy together a straw-man method to finger-point in ~ women and also “blue-pilled” culture at large.

#9. Culture Encourages masculine Providing since It’s an excellent For The people (Not simply for Women)

It’s true:

There is certainly a strong cultural strand influencing men to behave subserviently come women.And ns have also personally spent every one of my life rejecting the cultural diktat of the provider’s role.

But this is what Rollo doesn’t get:

It’s not (just) the “feminine imperative” that seeks to affect men right into providers’ roles.

When men carry out instead of, say, fuck and abandon pregnant women, it’s good for society.

And it’s because male providing is good for everyone that culture embraces it, not due to the fact that it’s component of the “feminine imperative” come trick men.

That’s what Rollo never seems come get.

Sure, women benefit when males provide, forgive their partying past and stay loyal.But so perform the children, the neighbors, the communities, culture as a totality and, an ext often than not, those men themselves.

Furthermore, we might make the situation that a man giving for his family members is embracing specific values that should respected, and not laughed at (even if we personally haven’t chosen that lifestyle).

#10. Rollo Tomassi Mistakes cultural “Feminine Imperative” With simple Effects of it is provided & Demand

Tomassi gets this all wrong.

He states that guys pedestalize women due to the fact that of the “female imperative” and the “cultural conditioning”.

I don’t check out it the way.

Sure, some males may autumn for the cultural strand of the feminine worldview. And I also agree that, today, the feminine watch is the most powerful.

But most an effective of every it’s the supply and also demand the the dating marketplace that impacts male behavior, not the “feminine imperative”.

Because most men are happy come impregnate most women and women are an ext selective, the rule of thumb is that women space the demand and also men room the offer.

And that is what makes women, naturally (and on average), the thing of desire.Not the “propaganda”, “female imperative”, “conditioning” or any type of other made-up conspiracy.

Furthermore, we deserve to argue the for many men, through the tiny options castle have, it’s reasonable to provide for women.

For an ext or and supply and also demand read:

#11. Many Sweeping Generalizations that Make For bad Analyses

Rollo’s theories space not wrong per se.

But they become mostly wrong as soon as he pretends lock generalize to practically everyone.

For example:

The girl friend you intend to develop a Disneyland life through will break up v you as her options expand and your restrict

I can’t believe how numerous pre-suppositions that sentence include. And most of them space unlikely to be true.Especially to be all true at the same time.

For example:

It presupposes he has actually a Disneyland fantasy in mindIt presupposes she has no Disneyland fantasyIt presupposes she goes come college, however he doesn’tIt presupposes she wants to “shop around”It presupposes the does not desire to shop roughly (really?)It presupposes her alternatives expand, yet his don’t

Notice that each of castle are feasible and, in some situations, even likely to be true.But that they’re every true in ~ the same time is not the most most likely scenario.

Basically, what Rollo states is true… for a couple of cases.But the minute he writes together if he to be describing a common situation, then Rollo’s otherwise an excellent micro-analysis i do not care a rash macro-theory.

The totality “Rational masculine Volume 2” is fraught through sweeping generalizations. Most of lock are great analyses of certain situations, yet most the them revolve into really poor systemic theories when Rollo over-generalizes.

#12. Let’s it is in Frank: There are Misogynistic Understone All through It

Same as for “Rational male Volume 1”.

In Rollo Tomassi’s worldview, women space “hypergamy-driven”, while males are idealistic.For example:

Hypergamy doesn’t treatment for male idealistic expectations of love

Of course, Rollo Tomassi portrays himself together neutral and also open-minded.But it just doesn’t come out well.He states yes, “women deserve to love deeply”, however take a look at the caveat:

Women deserve to love deeply, however from an completely opportunistic perspective

What’s that supposed to mean?Does it mean that guys “love deeply” native a purely altruistic perspective?

Nonsense.Watch this video clip for more.

#13. If A couple of Men are Gullible, It’s no Necessarily Women’s Fault, Is It?

The emotion of “Preventive Medicine” is the of manipulative guys who dupe men.

Yet my emotion was the the males Rollo explains are not “typical” men, yet a decimal of gullible men.

Is that women’s error if part men have actually Disneyland fantasies well right into their maturity?I don’t think so.

Furthermore, Rollo confuses manipulation with self-manipulation.It’s not only women who might want come hide a wild sexual past: it’s males who don’t want to see that past.

Also review the “Madonna-whore dichotomy“.

The Rational male Is male Feminist Equivalent

Have you noticed the parallels through feminism?

“Feminine imperative” is the equivalent of “patriarchy” and “hypergamy” is the feminist equivalent of “toxic masculinity”.

My appeal to you, my dear reader, is to move beyond petty group-identification and also to look instead at humanity, as well as genders, together subsets that the whole.As Robert Greene states (I paraphrase) “the just sense of belonging worthy of the name is the belonging to the person race”.

Look for Win-Win Instead

Bottom line:

You have the right to be much better and stronger searching for win-win relationship within that whole, quite than looking at reasons why you must be in ~ war.

Also read:

#14. Ns Don’t view A society of males Conditioned come Prioritize Relationships

Again one more case of bad generalization.

Rollo says that guys are conditioned come stick to relationship to the detriment of their experienced achievements.Women, instead, are conditioned to put themselves first.

I don’t know in which civilization Rollo lives, yet in this world, it’s females who, on average, put relationships very first and men who, on average, prioritize work, success, and also achievements.

And in for free societies, males are less conditioned to pursue lengthy term relationships and also do everything they like, no more.Men have actually never been free to stay single as they are today.

Rollo’s advice that guys should prioritize work and also not get distracted by women is additionally wrong, in my opinion.Just look in ~ the many successful men: numerous of them have long-term relationships and I’ve never ever seen any type of study linking bachelor-hood to male success.

If anything, it might be the opposite.

Indeed together Amir Levine explains in Attached, studies show that strong intimate relationships aid men come be much more confident in life and achieve more.

#15. It’s an excellent Analysis, however 100% Biased & One-Sided

It’s dubbed “The rational Male”.

But if one want to spoof it, they can dub it “the biased male”.

Rollo says he connect the dots. But he only connects the dots native the biased perspective of what he desires to see.

What Rollo says is no necessarily wrong but it presents, at (the very) best, only half of reality.

There is not even a solitary mention that male’s very own games, manipulations, and efforts to influence culture.And sure you don’t believe men room innocent creatures who don’t partake in the sex-related arms’ race, perform you?

If girlfriend do, take this together a wake-up call and read around here a bit more.

#16. It’s Divisive: that Pits Men against Women

This is what I favor least about Tomassi’s work:

It’s very divisive.

And, in that, it’s only far better than feminism due to the fact that of its more realistic analysis. But not because that its effects.

Most of rational Male’s theories room deeply, naturally divisive. And it couldn’t it is in otherwise due to the fact that it only looks at half of the game.

We have already seen an example: women have actually an “opportunistic approach to love” and men have “an idealistic technique to love”.

And albeit, again, over there is a backdrop of truth there… It’s just plain not correct to make it into a generalised rule.

Rollo Tomassi claims quoting one of his readers:

I know how hunger feels and also I assume females feel the exact same way.However I have no idea just how hypergamy feeling like, I have actually never felt its pull

What a load of bullshit!

Hypergamy is nothing yet the propensity to maximize one’s own returns and also men equally seek to maximize their returns (the good ones, at least).

It’s merely expressed differently, in men.

Read more in:

#17. Rollo’s theory Leads to toxicity Relationships since He Misapplies & Misunderstands game Theory

This is “Rollo Tomassi cardinal dominion of sexual strategy”:

For one gender’s sex-related strategy to succeed the other gender must deteriorate or abandon your own.

Which is basically a deep flawed misunderstanding of game theory used to relationships (also review “game concept bargaining“).

It is true the one player native each gender can gain more by short-changing the other.For example, purely native a utilitarian allude of view, a mrs might get much more if she deserve to trick much more than one guy to finance her lifestyle and invest in she offspring.And, similarly, a man can gain an ext by obtaining a mrs pregnant and also abandoning her.

This is since social relations are rather social exchanges and, thus, deserve to be explained in game theory terms.And tricking rather (defections) can yield outsized wins.

And in ~ the core, that’s what this rational Male approach is about: a long-winded summary of just how defection strategies apply to dating.The problem is the Rollo stops there!

Rollo Tomassi never moves past a “me VS you” paradigm.

Why does Rollo Tomassi sees it as a struggle?

Because Rollo’s viewpoint sees women as enemies of men.And that’s why, ns stated and confirm here, Rollo Tomassi’s philosophy is naturally misogynistic.

The difficulty with it?

First of all, morality.When you have an enemy, all amoral methods of dealing with them come to be moral (see Zimbardo, 2008)Rape is also a form of “defection strategy” the you’d use through an enemy.

But let’s stick come facts below without any type of morality.

Second, and most important of all, both genders can likewise gain if they support each other.Which is, guess: v what, the traditional view of relationships that culture aspires to -exactly what it have to do-.

Now, learning the concept of manipulation (“defection” in game’s concept terms), is extremely important to recognize reality and also to safeguard oneself.But listening to “red-pilled authors” pitching a defection strategy as the “real reality” that males should follow, that’s not just nonsense, that’s toxic nonsense.

The fact of sex-related Arms’ Race

In evolutionary psychology, the defection strategy has additionally been described as “sexual arms’ race”.It’s been well explored and also discussed by Robert Wright, which i invite girlfriend to check out (a good substitute for resentment-fuelled manosphere evolutionary psychology).

The reality of the sexual arms’ race is that it coexists through the countless -and likely stronger- incentives because that cooperation.And you deserve to minimize the incentives come defection while enjoy it an awesome and also supportive relationship.

TL,DR: Rollo Tomassi “red pill” is a potentially very toxic misinterpretation the relationships.I warmly welcome readers to seek an ext information -at the very least if they’re interested in win-win and also supportive relationships.

#18. Not an excellent For Seducers that Love Women

I’m glad I deserve to say this:

I to be a man. And I have been mostly single because I enjoy adventures. And also I really dislike feminism since it pitches women versus men.And I even think the this society is top top a warpath versus (white) men, especially through divorce law.

This provides me part credibility to criticize Rollo Tomassi’s philosophy.

See more: Watch Steven Universe Too Short To Ride Full Episode, Reaction To Too Short To Ride

And Rollo Tomassi’s ideology is toxicity for men who love women, including guys who like to sleep with many women.

Because seducers who choose women, like women, and also they don’t consider them as enemies!